Hero image

6Uploads

52Views

0Downloads

Innatism AQA A Level Philosophy
hannanbafaqihhannanbafaqih

Innatism AQA A Level Philosophy

(0)
5 page document! Details all the relevent necessary arguments and details regarding innatism for the AQA Philosophy A Level specification. Based on the Michael Lacewing textbook. -TWO ARGUMENTS FOR INNATE KNOWLEDGE -LEIBNIZ ON KNOWLEDGE OF NECESSARY TRUTHS -LOCKE’S ARGUMENTS AGAINST INNATE KNOWLEDGE -LEIBNIZ’S RESPONSE TO LOCKE -UNCONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE -ALTERNATIVE EMPIRICIST ACCOUNTS -LOCKE’S ARGUMENT AGAINST INNATE CONCEPTS -REJECTING LOCKE’S DEFINITION OF ‘INNATE CONCEPT’ -LEIBNIZ’S DEFENCE OF INNATE CONCEPTS
Teleological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level
hannanbafaqihhannanbafaqih

Teleological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level

(0)
6 page document! Resource details all the relevent necessary arguments and details regarding teleological arguments for the AQA Philosophy A Level specification. Based on the Michael Lacewing textbook. -THE DESIGN ARGUMENT FROM ANALOGY -HUME’S OBJECTION -PALEY’S DESIGN ARGUMENT -SWINBURNE’S DESIGN ARGUMENT -SWINBURNE’S RESPONSE TO HUME -HUME’S OBJECTIONS
Cosmological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level
hannanbafaqihhannanbafaqih

Cosmological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level

(0)
9 page resource! Document details all the relevent necessary arguments and details regarding cosmological arguments for the AQA Philosophy A Level specification. Based on the Michael Lacewing textbook. -The Kalam Argument. -Aquinas First and Second Ways. -Descartes Cosmological Argument. -Hume on the causal principle. -Aquinas’ Third Way. -Leibniz’s Argument from contingency. -Russel on the fallacy of composition. (+) ALL RELEVENT CRITICISMS!
Ontological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level
hannanbafaqihhannanbafaqih

Ontological Arguments AQA Philosophy A Level

(0)
5 page document. All the relevent necessary arguments and details regarding ontological arguments for the AQA Philosophy A Level syllabus. Based on the Michael Lacewing textbook Includes: Anselm Gaunilo Descarte Kant Malcom & any relevent responses/objections.